Anarchy 101/Institutional correction - Revision history

69.50.181.155 at 09:57, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T09:57:43Z

69.50.181.155 at 08:53, 11 September 2016

2016-09-11T08:53:04Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 06:47, 10 September 2016

2016-09-10T06:47:07Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 00:23, 8 September 2016

2016-09-08T00:23:34Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 00:06, 8 September 2016

2016-09-08T00:06:41Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 00:56, 22 August 2016

2016-08-22T00:56:32Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 21:44, 4 April 2016

2016-04-04T21:44:17Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 21:38, 4 April 2016

2016-04-04T21:38:12Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 21:38, 22 March 2016

2016-03-22T21:38:53Z

imported>Ivanhoe at 01:52, 10 March 2016

2016-03-10T01:52:25Z

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 <div style="max-width:500px; margin:auto;">
-<font size="5">'''Institutional correction'''</font>
+<font size="5">'''Institutional<br>correction'''</font>
@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 {{tab}}The {{sc|anarchy}} issue on [[Anarchy 98|Libertarian Criminology (No. 98)]] showed how difficult it is to define what would be a libertarian approach to crime and delinquency. Both of us to some extent identify with this vaguely specified approach and have tried (in my case more crudely and polemically) to indicate its relevance to these two institutions. Our friends who contributed to that issue of {{sc|anarchy}} will excuse us for saying that they dealt with the more &ldquo;glamorous&rdquo; sides of the debate&mdash;for example, questions about political deviance. The day to day happenings in Approved Schools and Detention Centres are the bread and butter side and it&rsquo;s hard to say anything very exciting about them. We only hope that the response of our political comrades will not be like one eminent politico who after reading the issue on Libertarian Criminology asked one of the contributors why he wasted his time writing about criminals and delinquents, they should just be kindly dealt with by putting them somewhere out of the way.}}
 <div style="align:right">[[Author:Stan Cohen|{{sc|stan cohen}}]]</div>
 </div>

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 {{DEFAULTSORT:Institutional correction}}
 [[Category:Children]]
 [[Category:Criminal justice]]
 [[Category:Sociology]]

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
-{{sc|In these articles}}, [[Author:Ian Taylor|Ian Taylor]] and I have looked at two of the types of questions that sociologists and others (like anarchists and socialists) who have a sceptical concern about society, might like to ask about our institutions which deal with juvenile offenders. The first question&mdash;one that can only be answered by personal experience and the sort of intensive observation he was able to employ&mdash;is dealt with by Ian in regard to [[../Approved School: how does it feel?|Approved Schools]]: just what does it look like and how does it feel to the boys inside? No one really interested in the system can understand it without such a perspective. The second question&mdash;one that can be answered by very superficial methods such as reading documents&mdash;is one that I deal with in regard to [[../Notes on Detention Centres|Detention Centres]]: how do the spokesmen of the system explain it and justify themselves to us? I have done this rather selectively and this analysis would need to be supplemented by a more detailed account of the ideology&mdash;preferably in the words of those involved in the system.
+{{j|{{sc|In these articles}}, [[Author:Ian Taylor|Ian Taylor]] and I have looked at two of the types of questions that sociologists and others (like anarchists and socialists) who have a sceptical concern about society, might like to ask about our institutions which deal with juvenile offenders. The first question&mdash;one that can only be answered by personal experience and the sort of intensive observation he was able to employ&mdash;is dealt with by Ian in regard to [[../Approved School: how does it feel?|Approved Schools]]: just what does it look like and how does it feel to the boys inside? No one really interested in the system can understand it without such a perspective. The second question&mdash;one that can be answered by very superficial methods such as reading documents&mdash;is one that I deal with in regard to [[../Notes on Detention Centres|Detention Centres]]: how do the spokesmen of the system explain it and justify themselves to us? I have done this rather selectively and this analysis would need to be supplemented by a more detailed account of the ideology&mdash;preferably in the words of those involved in the system.
 {{tab}}There are obvious points at which these areas of interest overlap and we would have liked to spend much more time in looking at the correspondence, or lack of correspondence between the official statements of what is happening and the perception from the inside of what is happening.
-{{tab}}The {{sc|anarchy}} issue on [[Anarchy 98|Libertarian Criminology (No. 98)]] showed how difficult it is to define what would be a libertarian approach to crime and delinquency. Both of us to some extent identify with this vaguely specified approach and have tried (in my case more crudely and polemically) to indicate its relevance to these two institutions. Our friends who contributed to that issue of {{sc|anarchy}} will excuse us for saying that they dealt with the more &ldquo;glamorous&rdquo; sides of the debate&mdash;for example, questions about political deviance. The day to day happenings in Approved Schools and Detention Centres are the bread and butter side and it&rsquo;s hard to say anything very exciting about them. We only hope that the response of our political comrades will not be like one eminent politico who after reading the issue on Libertarian Criminology asked one of the contributors why he wasted his time writing about criminals and delinquents, they should just be kindly dealt with by putting them somewhere out of the way.
+{{tab}}The {{sc|anarchy}} issue on [[Anarchy 98|Libertarian Criminology (No. 98)]] showed how difficult it is to define what would be a libertarian approach to crime and delinquency. Both of us to some extent identify with this vaguely specified approach and have tried (in my case more crudely and polemically) to indicate its relevance to these two institutions. Our friends who contributed to that issue of {{sc|anarchy}} will excuse us for saying that they dealt with the more &ldquo;glamorous&rdquo; sides of the debate&mdash;for example, questions about political deviance. The day to day happenings in Approved Schools and Detention Centres are the bread and butter side and it&rsquo;s hard to say anything very exciting about them. We only hope that the response of our political comrades will not be like one eminent politico who after reading the issue on Libertarian Criminology asked one of the contributors why he wasted his time writing about criminals and delinquents, they should just be kindly dealt with by putting them somewhere out of the way.}}
 <div style="align:right">[[Author:Stan Cohen|{{sc|stan cohen}}]]</div>
 </div>

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 <div style="max-width:500px; margin:auto;">
 <font size="5">'''Institutional correction'''</font>
 '''INTRODUCTION'''
 {{sc|In these articles}}, [[Author:Ian Taylor|Ian Taylor]] and I have looked at two of the types of questions that sociologists and others (like anarchists and socialists) who have a sceptical concern about society, might like to ask about our institutions which deal with juvenile offenders. The first question&mdash;one that can only be answered by personal experience and the sort of intensive observation he was able to employ&mdash;is dealt with by Ian in regard to [[../Approved School: how does it feel?|Approved Schools]]: just what does it look like and how does it feel to the boys inside? No one really interested in the system can understand it without such a perspective. The second question&mdash;one that can be answered by very superficial methods such as reading documents&mdash;is one that I deal with in regard to [[../Notes on Detention Centres|Detention Centres]]: how do the spokesmen of the system explain it and justify themselves to us? I have done this rather selectively and this analysis would need to be supplemented by a more detailed account of the ideology&mdash;preferably in the words of those involved in the system.

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 {{sc|In these articles}}, [[Author:Ian Taylor|Ian Taylor]] and I have looked at two of the types of questions that sociologists and others (like anarchists and socialists) who have a sceptical concern about society, might like to ask about our institutions which deal with juvenile offenders. The first question&mdash;one that can only be answered by personal experience and the sort of intensive observation he was able to employ&mdash;is dealt with by Ian in regard to [[../Approved School: how does it feel?|Approved Schools]]: just what does it look like and how does it feel to the boys inside? No one really interested in the system can understand it without such a perspective. The second question&mdash;one that can be answered by very superficial methods such as reading documents&mdash;is one that I deal with in regard to [[../Notes on Detention Centres|Detention Centres]]: how do the spokesmen of the system explain it and justify themselves to us? I have done this rather selectively and this analysis would need to be supplemented by a more detailed account of the ideology&mdash;preferably in the words of those involved in the system.
-There are obvious points at which these areas of interest overlap and we would have liked to spend much more time in looking at the correspondence, or lack of correspondence between the official statements of what is happening and the perception from the inside of what is happening.
+{{tab}}There are obvious points at which these areas of interest overlap and we would have liked to spend much more time in looking at the correspondence, or lack of correspondence between the official statements of what is happening and the perception from the inside of what is happening.
-The {{sc|anarchy}} issue on [[Anarchy 98|Libertarian Criminology (No. 98)]] showed how difficult it is to define what would be a libertarian approach to crime and delinquency. Both of us to some extent identify with this vaguely specified approach and have tried (in my case more crudely and polemically) to indicate its relevance to these two institutions. Our friends who contributed to that issue of {{sc|anarchy}} will excuse us for saying that they dealt with the more &ldquo;glamorous&rdquo; sides of the debate&mdash;for example, questions about political deviance. The day to day happenings in Approved Schools and Detention Centres are the bread and butter side and it&rsquo;s hard to say anything very exciting about them. We only hope that the response of our political comrades will not be like one eminent politico who after reading the issue on Libertarian Criminology asked one of the contributors why he wasted his time writing about criminals and delinquents, they should just be kindly dealt with by putting them somewhere out of the way.
+{{tab}}The {{sc|anarchy}} issue on [[Anarchy 98|Libertarian Criminology (No. 98)]] showed how difficult it is to define what would be a libertarian approach to crime and delinquency. Both of us to some extent identify with this vaguely specified approach and have tried (in my case more crudely and polemically) to indicate its relevance to these two institutions. Our friends who contributed to that issue of {{sc|anarchy}} will excuse us for saying that they dealt with the more &ldquo;glamorous&rdquo; sides of the debate&mdash;for example, questions about political deviance. The day to day happenings in Approved Schools and Detention Centres are the bread and butter side and it&rsquo;s hard to say anything very exciting about them. We only hope that the response of our political comrades will not be like one eminent politico who after reading the issue on Libertarian Criminology asked one of the contributors why he wasted his time writing about criminals and delinquents, they should just be kindly dealt with by putting them somewhere out of the way.
-:::::::::: [[Author:Stan Cohen|{{sc|stan cohen}}]]
+<div style="align:right">[[Author:Stan Cohen|{{sc|stan cohen}}]]</div>
 </div>
 [[Category:Children]]
 [[Category:Criminal justice]]
 [[Category:Sociology]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{header
-  | title      = [[../|ANARCHY 101 (Vol 9 No 7) JULY 1969]]<br>&ldquo;Institutional correction&rdquo;
+  | title      = [[../|ANARCHY 101 (Vol 9 No 7) JULY 1969]]<br>Institutional correction
   | author     = Stan Cohen
   | section    =

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 4 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~'''~~[[~~Anarchy 101~~\|ANARCHY 101 (Vol 9 No 7) JULY 1969]]~~'''~~	+	{{header
		+	\| title = [[../\|ANARCHY 101 (Vol 9 No 7) JULY 1969]]<br>“Institutional correction”
		+	\| author = Stan Cohen
		+	\| section =
		+	\| previous = [[../\|Contents of No. 101]]
		+	\| next = [[../Approved School: how does it feel?\|Approved School: how does it feel?]]
		+	\| notes =
		+	}}